|all articles latest | past | articles by topics | search wildnews|
wild news on wildsingapore
and Planet website, 5 Aug 05
Nature's water "factories" under threat
Pollution, dam construction and climate change, are all combining to destroy watersheds and freshwater ecosystems at a rapid rate. But by putting a price on - and protecting these - "natural services", cities and rural areas can purify drinking water, alleviate hunger, mitigate flood damages, and meet other societal goals at a fraction of the cost of conventional alternatives, says a new Worldwatch study.
Global warming is the wild card that could further degrade the natural systems that safeguard our water supply, which could result in falling water tables, shrinking wetlands, vanishing species, and a decrease in both the quality and quantity of available freshwater, warns Sandra Postel, director of the Global Water Policy Project, and author of the study, Liquid Assets: The Critical Need to Safeguard Freshwater Ecosystems.
Pollution, population growth, and antiquated policies are contributing to the litany of serious impacts. Water management methods in the twentieth century have attempted to control and manipulate the hydrological cycle to best fit human needs with dams, diversions, levees, and reservoirs. While these engineering solutions help provide food, water, and electricity for many people, they have also severely disrupted the functioning of aquatic ecosystems.
Some of the impacts mentioned in the report include:
Dam construction: Over 45,000 large dams now exist, up from 5,000 in 1950. Dams affect over half of the world's major river systems and more than three-quarters of large river systems in the United States, Canada, Europe, and the former Soviet Union. Dams contribute to species and habitat loss, deter fish migration, destroy natural flow patterns, and alter water temperature and nutrient and sediment transport.
Pollution: Increasing amounts of fertilizer, pesticides, heavy metals, and synthetic chemicals are being released into aquatic ecosystems, drastically altering the chemistry of lakes, rivers, and streams. These pollutants lessen the safety of drinking water, harm fish and wildlife, and lead to the spread of oxygen-depleted "dead zones."
Greenhouse gas emissions: Climate change linked to the buildup of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is expected to shift rainfall and runoff patterns, melt glaciers and shrink snowpacks, and increase the number and intensity of floods and droughts. Some of these trends appear to be under way already.
Earth's water assets
Rivers, lakes, wetlands, and other freshwater ecosystems provide a myriad of services that are essential to human well-being. "Healthy watersheds are nature's water factories, and it pays to protect them," says Postel. "Forests and wetlands can churn out high-quality water supplies at a lower cost than conventional treatment plants do, while providing many other valuable benefits at the same time, from recreational enjoyment to biodiversity conservation to climate protection."
Prevailing water management systems are plagued by waste and inefficiency, placing unnecessary strain on natural water sources. It is common for cities to lose 20-50 percent of their water to leaks and other problems in the distribution system. Taiwan, for example, loses nearly 2 million cubic metres of water a day to leakage-roughly equal to 325 million toilet flushes. Governments and utilities continue to spend taxpayer and customer dollars on expensive dams and treatment plants while a third or more of their existing supply is leaking away. "It almost seems as if the point of public policy is to liquidate Earth's water assets like a store going out of business," says Postel.
By reducing waste and encouraging conservation, cities can leave more water in rivers and lakes, build fewer and smaller dams, pump less groundwater, and reduce the amount of energy and chemicals needed to treat and distribute their supply. Unfortunately, notes Postel, "in most cases, watershed protection remains the neglected stepchild of water supply systems, and conservation is relegated to drought-response at best."
Many forward-thinking cities and municipalities, however, are discovering that it is more cost-effective to employ nature's services rather than further destroy them:
In 1997, New York City reached an agreement with local and federal officials, environmental organizations, and 70 towns to spend $1.5 billion over ten years on watershed protection and conservation measures, thereby avoiding construction of a filtration plant that would cost $6 billion to build and $300 million a year to operate. As of 2004, the city had invested more than $1 billion in the watershed program.
Through successful conservation efforts, Bogotá, Colombia, has delayed the need to build new water supply facilities for at least 20 years. By protecting the natural filtering capacity of wetlands in its watershed, the city also keeps treatment costs low. Today, 95 per cent of households in Bogotá have potable water and 87 per cent have sewage services.
Water use in the Boston metropolitan area hit a 50-year low in 2004 due to an aggressive conservation program launched in the late 1980s that has indefinitely postponed a proposed diversion of the Connecticut River, and has saved residents over $500 million in capital expenditures alone.
"Today we are apt to think that our globalized and technologically sophisticated world is immune to societal collapse from ecological degradation," notes Postel. "But there is no side-stepping human dependence on the water cycle and we are disrupting it in dangerous ways."
Related articles on Global: biodiversity and Singapore: water issues
|News articles are reproduced for non-profit educational purposes.|
website©ria tan 2003 www.wildsingapore.com