| 
        
          |  EXPLOREEXPRESSACT! |  |  
         
          | Plans 
            to 'build a reef' at Hantu: some issues updated 3 Jun 06
 
 "Singapore Underwater Federation ... aims to build 
            a coral reef in the lagoon enclosed by Pulau Hantu" media 
            reports
 
 Their publicised plans include the following, which raises some questions...
 
 Census of Hantu and our reefs
 SUF will "conduct the largest census of marine biodiversity undertaken 
            here"
 ST 31 Mar 06
 How will the SUF census be different from the surveys of all our reefs 
            that are already ongoing and for which data is already available online? 
            more
 
 How will this reef be 'built'?
 "They are also planning to move corals from other reefs to the 
            island."
 CNA 30 Mar 06
 Past coral relocation efforts in Singapore: have they worked? more
 Where are these 'other' reefs from which corals will be taken?
 
 "Plans are under way to create a simple sand filtration system 
            to eliminate most of the sediment from the water flowing into the 
            lagoon, creating a clear water habitat." ST 31 Mar 06
 Does this mean the 'built reef' will be isolated from the surroundings? 
            (in effect, a giant aquarium). Filter-speak: 
            What does filtration involve? What are the risks to the habitat?
 
 Where will this reef be located on Pulau Hantu?
 Location of 'built reef' is as indicated below...
 
   Pulau Hantu is made up of two smaller islands: Hantu Besar and Hantu 
            Kecil.
 
 The map provided in the media 
            (above) suggests there these two islands are well separated and that 
            there are corals around each of the smaller islands.
 
 In reality, there is a shallow lagoon between the two islands. At 
            low tide, this lagoon is exposed out of water. At high tide, the water 
            reaches about 1.5-2m in height on average. This allows comfortable 
            and safe swimming. While snorkelling is possible, diving is not practical 
            in the lagoon as it currently is.
 
   Coral reefs have regenerated outside the man-made seawalls. There 
            are several submerged reefs near Pulau Hantu. These are called 'terumbus'.This 
            lagoon and the reef flats are already teeming with marine life.
 
 What is the state of marine life on Pulau Hantu today?
 Webpages with photos of what you can see 
            at Pulau Hantu right now.
 
 To 'build' the reef in this lagoon will probably involve extensive 
            changes to the depth of the lagoon. What will impact be on existing 
            marine life there and in the surrounding reef flats and terumbus?
 
 Other issues...
 "The divers, however, face a difficult task because of poor visibility 
            caused by silt suspended in the water. It can be so bad that 'you 
            have to bump into coral to notice them', said Project Noah manager 
            Spencer Lewis." ST 31 Mar 06
 Will SUF divers involved in the census be properly trained so as not 
            to damage our reefs as they do their census? See also Cashing 
            in on Corals about studies on the damage caused to reefs by divers 
            who touch corals.
 
 (The visibility in our waters is not always that bad. In fact, the 
            vis at Hantu can be quite good and may be among the best of our Southern 
            islands, see chart below and discussion 
            of viz on the habitatnews blog thanks to Siva for the alert.
 
 Professionals, scientists and regular divers in our waters generally 
            know how to manage underwater activities without damaging our reefs. 
            They would certainly not 'bump' into corals to find them).
 
 
   
 "Mr 
            Chew emphasised that 'the lagoon isn't just for divers', saying: 'It's 
            for anyone who wants to get wet and enjoy our marine life.'" 
            ST 31 Mar 06
 How will the created reef be managed? In particular, will the impact 
            on the reef and surrounding habitats be well managed?
 
 "Mr Lewis sees the likelihood of Project Noah developing into 
            a lucrative business" BT 31 Mar 06
 What will the environmental impact be if the 'built reef' is run as 
            a commercial enterprise? Cashing in on corals: 
            impact of divers and boaters on reefs some extracts of studies 
            done on the issue.
 
 Who are the project leads? What are their interests in the project?
 More about why this is vague in the reports of 
            the SUF briefing. In the press release 
            (PDF file), Sydney Chew was identified as Managing Director of Aquos 
            Pte Ltd and SUF member. Here is the ACRA 
            printout (PDF file) about the company.
 
 What are the issues in evaluating a proposal 
            to reef rehabilitation?
 See this PDF document on the Reef Check website "Beware 
            Hype on Artificial Reef Rehabilitiation" a document of the 
            International 
            Coral Reef Initiative which in summary states, among others, that
 
 "The most effective mechanism of rehabilitating coral reefs 
            is through mitigation of chronic human disturbances (e.g. sedimentation, 
            pollution and over-fishing), thereby facilitating natural recovery 
            mechanisms and building resilience, to any further disturbances, that 
            will be effective over large areas";
 
 "In addition to effectiveness considerations, construction of 
            any engineered structure on a coral reef must be evaluated against 
            any potential environmental damage caused during construction or later 
            degradation"
 
 "Some innovative and new approaches to coral reef conservation 
            and management may have limited applications, there have been insufficient 
            peer-reviewed, long-term scientific studies of reef rehabilitation 
            using these techniques and few cost-benefit analyses to assess effectiveness 
            of the methods over natural recovery processes."
 
 "Governments, international agencies, NGOs and other parties 
            [are advised] that they should carefully examine claims from commercial 
            and non-commercial groups selling or proposing ‘engineering’ solutions 
            for coral reef rehabilitation and to seek advice recognised scientific 
            bodies before investing in risky, unproven and expensive engineering 
            techniques which may exacerbate environmental damage and divert funds 
            away from more effective measures"
 |  
 | 
       |