|  | 
         
          | The 
            Straits Times, 30 Dec 04 
 Suggested 
            15% gaming tax is 'fair rate'
 
 A PROPOSED 15 per cent gaming tax has turned out to be the most attractive 
            recommendation among the guidelines the Government has drawn up for 
            a potential integrated resort here. While not cast in stone and meant 
            as a working assumption for investors to do their sums, casino operators 
            and gaming experts contacted yesterday said that such a quantum of 
            tax on gross gaming revenue fell into the lower ranges of what other 
            countries levied.
 
 'It is a very fair rate,' said Las-Vegas based gaming analyst Jonathan 
            Galaviz. Harrah's Entertainment senior vice-president (business development) 
            Richard Mirman agreed that it was 'reasonable', pointing to tax rates 
            in the United States, which range from about 7 per cent in Nevada 
            to as high as 50 per cent in Illinois. The gaming giant owns 28 casinos 
            across the US and is in the process of acquiring the well-known Caesars 
            brand. In the region, Macau has a gaming tax of close to 40 per cent, 
            Australia's ranges from 6 per cent to over 30 per cent depending on 
            the state, and South Korea's stands at about 30 per cent, experts 
            said.
 
 Casino operators and analysts said a 15 per cent tax rate would help 
            make up for the expected fall in revenue that would arise from the 
            entry restrictions imposed by the Government.
 
 Among other requirements, Singaporeans and permanent residents have 
            to be at least 21 years old and would have to pay a $100 membership 
            fee per day, or $2,000 annually. Mr Ronald Tan, a consultant specialising 
            in the hospitality industry and who has worked as an adviser to casino 
            gaming companies, said: 'The curbs can be quite serious dampeners.'
 
 Mr Galaviz added that having a local market was 'symbiotic' with a 
            tourist one, as both allow for the 'feasibility of building a large-scale 
            resort'. The view was echoed by Mr Mirman: 'Restrictions reduce overall 
            demand by taking out a certain segment of the market. It is going 
            to be a challenge to build something of the same size and scale.' 
            But Harrah's, which previously indicated that it was prepared to pump 
            in at least US$1 billion (S$1.64 billion) here, still 'believes this 
            is a very viable business'. US gaming giants like MGM-Mirage, Harrah's 
            Entertainment and Las Vegas Sands, as well as Bahamas' Kerzner International 
            have all indicated keen interest in a Singapore integrated resort 
            project, even giving investment estimates of between US$1 billion 
            and US$2 billion.
 
 Sources say the operators have teamed up with local developers to 
            submit proposals but none of the parties involved would confirm this. 
            It is said that MGM-Mirage and Kerzner International have teamed up 
            with CapitaLand, Harrah's Entertainment has partnered Keppel Land, 
            while Las Vegas Sands is said to be working with Hotel Properties.
 
 Yesterday, Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry Vivian 
            Balakrishnan said the Government will not subsidise the project, nor 
            will it take a stake in it. But he added that he doesn't speak for 
            government-linked companies, which are not part of the Government.
 
 Although Dr Balakrishnan said he is ready to consider a resort without 
            a casino component, overseas experiences have shown that similar entertainment 
            hubs may not be economically viable if the casino component is removed. 
            'Revenue generated from the casino is used to cross-subsidise the 
            other non-gaming attractions, which in turn attract the large number 
            of visitors. These facilities leverage off each other and become viable 
            because of the high volume of traffic drawn to the wide range of entertainment 
            options available,' he said, pointing to the Atlantis model in the 
            Bahamas. Some 75 per cent of Atlantis' total revenues come from non-gaming 
            components like retail and dining.
 
 But the gaming taxes, estimated to be 10 per cent of gaming revenues 
            collected by the Bahamas government last year, was US$23 million. 
            Aside from the competitive tax rate, another attraction is the exclusivity 
            period for licences awarded - preliminarily put at 10 years - which 
            would go some way towards restricting supply, said Mr Mirman.
 |  
 |